An independent design exploration · Unofficial prototype

Research / A starting point for inquiry

Make room for the evidence.

Start with a question. Read a short guide. Follow the link to the source.

Electoral rules have direct effects on representation. Broader political and social outcomes need a more cautious reading of the evidence.

Featured evidence

Two numbers. One useful question.

How closely does representation reflect votes?

New Democratic Party — Canada, 2019 · Historical first-past-the-post results

The NDP’s share of House seats was smaller than its share of valid votes. This is one historical example; the gap varies by party and election.

These results are not a prediction of what would have happened under PR. Different rules could change voter and party behaviour.

Read the votes-and-seats guide and complete 2019 comparison

Reading the evidence

What we know — and how sure we are.

A direct effect of electoral rules and a broader empirical association are different kinds of evidence.

Strong, Moderate and Mixed are editorial summaries of the evidence reviewed, not ratings supplied by the original researchers or numerical confidence scores. This is a focused review, not an exhaustive systematic review.

strong

PR makes seat distributions more proportional.

This is its central institutional purpose. Actual proportionality depends on thresholds, district magnitude, compensation and other design choices; exact national equality is not guaranteed.

mixed

The claim that PR reduces polarization has mixed support.

A major review finds weak and inconsistent relationships with left–right party polarization. Ideological distance, hostility between voters and parliamentary civility are different outcomes.

Reading library

Explore by topic.

Start with the short explanation, then open the guide. Full guides still in development are marked as planned.

12 research topics · 1 full guide available

Voter choice

Is a ranked ballot the same thing as PR?

Rankings alone do not make an election proportional. Compare single-member ranked voting with multi-member STV.

Full guide planned

Voter choice

Does PR eliminate strategic voting?

PR can reduce some reasons for strategic voting, but does not eliminate it. Thresholds, coalition calculations and local contests still matter.

Full guide planned

Voter choice

How do party lists affect candidate choice?

Closed, open and flexible lists offer different degrees of candidate choice. Nomination decisions remain relevant under every model.

Full guide planned

Governance

Does PR always produce coalition governments?

Coalitions are more likely as a broad tendency, but they are not inevitable. A party can still win a majority or govern as a minority.

Full guide planned

Governance

Does PR make governments unstable?

The evidence is mixed, and “stability” can mean several different things. Cabinet duration is not the same as election frequency or democratic survival.

Full guide planned

Participation

What does the research say about turnout?

Comparative research often associates PR with higher turnout. It does not establish a guaranteed increase or a precise Canadian effect.

Full guide planned

Participation

What does the evidence say about women’s representation?

PR, especially list systems, is associated with greater women’s representation. Recruitment, quotas and ballot rules matter; parity is not guaranteed.

Full guide planned

Electoral systems

How does Single Transferable Vote work?

STV uses candidate rankings and transferable vote value to elect several district representatives. Counting rules vary by jurisdiction.

Full guide planned

Electoral systems

What do district magnitude and thresholds change?

District seat numbers and thresholds affect proportionality and entry to seat allocation. Both involve choices and trade-offs.

Full guide planned

How this evidence is used

Use official election results for historical vote and seat claims, and authoritative institutional sources for electoral mechanics.

Follow advocacy claims through to underlying research. An association between countries does not establish what reform would cause in Canada.

Keep uncertainty where findings are mixed. Measurable proportionality is one democratic criterion; broader judgments about fairness also depend on values.

Research reviewed: .

A democracy we shape together

Help the conversation
move forward.

Support Fair Vote Canada’s work for proportional representation.

Donations take place on Fair Vote Canada’s official website. This prototype does not collect payments or supporter information.

Donate to Fair Vote Canada

Continue to the official website