An independent design exploration · Unofficial prototype
ActiveCanada-wideDemo campaign · unofficial prototype

Make room for a national conversation.

Call for a national citizens’ assembly on electoral reform.

A citizens’ assembly is one possible way for people to examine electoral options, hear different perspectives, and develop recommendations. This example explores how a public invitation might be presented.

The ask

What we’re asking for

In this hypothetical campaign, supporters would call for three things.

  1. Establish an independent assembly

    Create a national citizens’ assembly on electoral reform that works independently of government and political parties.

  2. Give people time and information

    Give ordinary Canadians structured time, balanced information and a range of perspectives to study the electoral options.

  3. Bring recommendations forward

    Have the assembly produce recommendations for consideration by Parliament and public institutions.

A fictional ask for design review. It does not describe a timeline, legislation, or a commitment by any government, party or MP, and it is not a live Fair Vote Canada campaign.

The idea

Why a citizens’ assembly?

What is a citizens’ assembly?

A group of residents, usually chosen by lottery to broadly reflect the wider population, who learn about an issue, hear from people with different views, deliberate together and make recommendations.

Why might one be useful for electoral reform?

Voting systems involve trade-offs between values such as proportionality, local representation and simplicity. An assembly is one way to give people who are not elected under the current rules the time and information to weigh those trade-offs.

What would make one credible?

That would depend on its design: independence, transparent selection of members, balanced information, enough time to deliberate, and a clear public account of how its recommendations would be considered.

Canadian context: British Columbia’s Citizens’ Assembly recommended a form of STV for the province in 2004 (Citizens’ Assembly archive ↗). Research on how citizens’ assemblies perform has not yet been reviewed for this prototype; deeper sourcing is planned.

Take action / Prototype only

Add your voice.

Your action

Ask your federal representative to support an independent national citizens’ assembly on electoral reform.

In a production version, this action could identify your federal representative and prepare a message asking them to support a national citizens’ assembly on electoral reform. In this prototype, no representative is identified and nothing is sent.

Preview the message

Illustrative draft · prototype copy

Dear [your federal representative],

I’m writing to ask you to support an independent national citizens’ assembly to study electoral reform and provide recommendations for Canada.

An assembly would give a group of Canadians the time and balanced information to examine how we elect our representatives, and to bring recommendations forward for Parliament to consider.

I would be grateful to know whether you would support this.

Sincerely, [Your name] [Your postal code]

Not an official Fair Vote Canada message. Text in square brackets marks what a production version would fill in; this prototype fills in nothing and sends nothing.

Prototype only. No information entered here is transmitted or stored.

All four fields are required.

Used in a production campaign to identify your federal riding and representative. This prototype does not look anything up.

Canadian format, for example A1A 1A1

Evidence and background

Read as much as you need.

The case for reform is set out elsewhere in this prototype, with sources.

Questions

About this campaign

What is a citizens’ assembly?

A group of residents, usually chosen by lottery to broadly reflect the population, who study an issue, deliberate and make recommendations. The details vary from one design to another.

Is this the same as a referendum?

No. In a referendum, all eligible voters vote on a question. A citizens’ assembly is a smaller group that studies an issue in depth and makes recommendations. This demo campaign does not propose a referendum or rule one out.

Why not let Parliament decide directly?

Parliament would still decide. In this hypothetical ask, an assembly would make recommendations for Parliament and public institutions to consider; it would not replace them. The case for an assembly is that it adds a considered public view from people who are not elected under the rules being reviewed.

Does this campaign endorse one specific PR model?

No. The demo ask is for a process, not a model. Studying the options would be the assembly’s work. This prototype introduces MMP and STV without recommending either.

Is this a real campaign?

No. It is a fictional example in an unofficial design prototype. It is not run or endorsed by Fair Vote Canada, and the form on this page does not send or store anything. Visit Fair Vote Canada’s official website for its actual activities.

Beyond this action

Other ways to participate

Status
active
Scope
Canada-wide
Type
Demo campaign, unofficial prototype
Mock content updated

A democracy we shape together

Help the conversation
move forward.

Support Fair Vote Canada’s work for proportional representation.

Donations take place on Fair Vote Canada’s official website. This prototype does not collect payments or supporter information.

Donate to Fair Vote Canada

Continue to the official website